Skip to main content

Real-Estate Crowdfunding 2026: InRento vs EstateGuru & More

By Thomas Lovas Lokoy

Researched and drafted with AI assistance from published sources; edited and published by NorwegianSpark SA.

Last updated: September 2026 · 7 min read

A cash machine recessed into a flat, bright blue wall panel, its dark screen and keypad the only break in the colour.

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Always consult a qualified financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Disclosure: this page contains affiliate links. If you sign up through them we may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you. It does not change what we write.

The short answer: most European "real-estate crowdfunding" is lending, not ownership. InRento and EstateGuru both lend against a mortgage on the property; the difference is that InRento's loans fund rental properties and add a capital-gain component at the end, while EstateGuru pays interest only. Neither is deposit-protected, both are illiquid, and the structure of each project — debt, rental note or equity — decides what you actually own.

Real-estate crowdfunding sits between pure peer-to-peer lending and direct property ownership. Instead of funding consumer loans, you fund a specific property or development and earn development interest, a share of rental income, or a share of the eventual sale — depending on whether the product is a loan, a rental note or equity.

InRento is built around buy-to-let rental projects. Each loan is secured by a first-rank mortgage, pays monthly interest funded by rent, and adds a capital-gain component at the end — a fixed annual uplift or a share of profit, depending on the project — from a minimum of €500 per project, under a Bank of Lithuania crowdfunding licence. It appeals to people who want landlord-style income without managing tenants, voids or maintenance. Crowdpear also lends against property, alongside secured business loans, and states it is on the Bank of Lithuania's public list of crowdfunding service providers.

Modena is a newer European crowdlending and crowdfunding platform, open to EEA residents only; with a shorter track record there is less history through which to judge default and recovery behaviour. FinForta is no longer linked from this site: our regulatory dataset found it presenting a Czech virtual-asset service provider registration, which does not authorise crowdfunding or lending, and the affiliate programme we held for it closed on 30 September 2026.

For comparison, established secured lender EstateGuru offers loan-based property exposure with interest only — a useful contrast when deciding whether you want income-and-upside or fixed interest. The distinction matters at tax time too, since rental distributions, interest and capital gains are often treated differently in your home jurisdiction.

The defining feature of property crowdfunding is illiquidity: your money is typically committed for the life of the project, often a year or more, and secondary-market exit is not guaranteed. Size each position on the assumption you cannot get out early, and never fund a single project with money you might need. Capital at risk. This is not financial advice.

EstateGuru vs InRento

EstateGuruInRento
What you fundBridge and development loans to property developers and businessesLoans to rental-property projects
SecurityMortgage, most commonly first-rankFirst-rank mortgage
How you are paidInterest onlyMonthly interest from rent plus a capital-gain component at the end
Minimum€50 per project€500 per project
LicenceCrowdfunding authorisation, Estonia's FinantsinspektsioonCrowdfunding licence LB002222, Bank of Lithuania
Exit before maturitySecondary market, 1% seller feeSecondary market, 2% seller fee

The practical difference for a small investor is the minimum: at €500 a project, spreading across ten InRento projects needs ten times the capital that ten EstateGuru loans need. The full detail is in our EstateGuru review and InRento review, and the collateral-type comparison is in EstateGuru vs LANDE.

Frequently asked questions

Is real-estate crowdfunding the same as owning property?

Usually not. Most European platforms, InRento and EstateGuru included, sell loans secured on property. You are a lender with a claim on the mortgage, not a co-owner, unless the project is explicitly structured as equity.

Is real-estate crowdfunding safe?

It is capital-at-risk and not deposit-protected. A mortgage reduces loss severity if a borrower defaults, but enforcement can take many months and a forced sale may not cover the loan.

Which is better, EstateGuru or InRento?

Neither in general. EstateGuru suits smaller tickets and interest-only lending from €50; InRento suits investors who want rental-linked loans with an upside component and can commit €500 per project.

Three Different Things Sold Under One Name

"Real estate crowdfunding" covers structures that behave nothing alike. Establishing which one you are buying is the first and most consequential step:

StructureWhat you holdWhere the return comes fromMain risk
Development loanA debt claim, usually securedFixed interestProject fails to complete or sell
Rental incomeA share of net rent, via a note or SPVRent, minus costsVacancy, arrears, cost inflation
Equity in a propertyAn economic interest in the assetRent plus any capital gainFull market exposure, both ways
Platform balance-sheet productA claim on the platformWhatever the platform paysThe platform itself

Debt is capped upside with a defined claim. Equity is uncapped in both directions and sits behind every lender. A rental-income product sits in between and is the one most often described as if it were a savings account, which it is not.

The Costs Between Gross Yield and Your Bank Account

Advertised yields are gross of a stack of costs that vary by structure. Reconstruct the whole stack before comparing two offers:

•Platform fee, charged to investors, to the project, or both.
•SPV and administration costs where a company is interposed to hold the asset.
•Property operating costs on rental products — management, maintenance, insurance, local taxes, and the void periods between tenants.
•Currency conversion in and out, if the project is not in your own currency. This is frequently larger than the fee difference between two platforms. See currency risk and hedged share classes.
•Withholding tax at source, plus whatever your own jurisdiction charges. The mechanics are in the foreign dividend withholding tax guide.

A yield quoted before all of that is not comparable to a yield quoted after it, and platforms are not consistent about which they publish.

Liquidity Is the Part That Is Usually Overstated

Most of these products are illiquid by construction, and the exits offered are weaker than they sound:

•A secondary market only works if there is a buyer. In calm conditions there usually is. In the conditions where you would most want to exit, there usually is not — and that correlation is the whole problem.
•Selling at a discount is the realistic exit, and some platforms cap how large a discount you may offer.
•A stated term is a plan, not a guarantee. Development projects overrun routinely, and an extension is a normal outcome rather than a failure.

Treat money committed here as money you do not need back on a date. If you need a date, the structures that actually offer one are covered in the yield ladder for money you need within twelve months.

Diversification That Is Actually Diversification

Holding five projects on one platform diversifies the project and not much else — you still carry one platform, one legal structure, one regulator and often one property market. Genuine spreading means varying the platform, the country, the structure and the sponsor, and accepting that doing so multiplies the amount of due diligence rather than dividing it.

Capital at risk. This is not personalised advice.

About this article

This article was written by Thomas Lovas Lokoy — researched and drafted with AI assistance from published sources; edited and published by NorwegianSpark SA. YieldNav is operated by NorwegianSpark SA (org. 834 984 172), founded by Thomas Lovas Lokoy. We are not licensed financial advisers, and nothing here is personalised advice. Some links are affiliate links; where a partner pays us, your capital is still at risk and our editorial view is unchanged. Read our about page, editorial policy and affiliate disclosure.

Share this article

Continue in this collection